Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Zach Zeff - March 6

Title: 
Should There Be Higher Levels of Selenium?

Purpose:
The purpose of my project was to inform the class on the EPA review process that allows companies to conduct their own scientific studies in order to lower regulation standards and to educate the class on the negative effect mining has on the environment: selenium.

Discussion Questions:

–Do you think selenium levels should be raised?
–Do you believe the company’s conclusions are accurate or biased?

Jeff Holmstead, head of the environmental strategies group at Bracewell & Giuliani and adviser for the EPA during President George W. Bush’s administration, said it was “not at all unusual” for federal agencies to differ on this kind of issues.
“It is surprising that the E.P.A. is supporting a less stringent standard than another agency,” he said. That may be, he added, “because selenium is primarily an issue for wildlife and not for human health,” which is the agency’s top priority
. 

–If what Jeff Holmstead says is true (EPA is supporting a less stringent standard; selenium is primarily an issue for wildlife and not for human health), do you think the Environmental Protection Agency should be more or less stringent on policies concerning wildlife?


Picture:
Scientific study commissioned by the J. R. Simplot Company, whose mining operations have polluted nearby creeks in southern Idaho. These are photographs of variously mutated brown trout from within the study. Some of the trout have two heads; others had facial, fin and egg deformities.




Powerpoint Presentation: 


Follow up research:
-Article written by the New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/science/earth/mutated-trout-raise-new-concerns-over-selenium.html?pagewanted=2&ref=earth 
-Integrated Risk Information done by the EPA: Health assessment information on a chemical substance is included in IRIS only after a comprehensive review of chronic toxicity data by U.S. EPA health scientists from several Program Offices and the Office of Research and Development.
http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0472.htm
-EPA basic information on Selenium:
http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/selenium.cfm

Sources:
Article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/science/earth/mutated-trout-raise-new-concerns-over-selenium.html?pagewanted=2&ref=earth

http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/selenium.cfm


Images:
-http://periodictable.com/Samples/034.12/s9s.JPG
-http://education.jlab.org/itselemental/tableofelements.png
-http://ecohydrology-research.org/images/US-FishAndWildlifeService-Logo.png
-http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2012/02/23/us/jp-SELENIUM.html
-http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/barbara_boxer/index.html?inline=nyt-per
-http://www.peyron.com/images/clients/rpnt1_Simplot%20logo%20(3).PNG
-http://buildinggreennetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/EPA-Logo.jpg
-http://seleniumhq.org/images/big-logo.png


Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Yellowstone Supervolcano- Henry Kinder

1. Henry Kinder, 1/31/12

2. Yellowstone: Benign National Park or Ticking Time Bomb?
The purpose was to educate the class about the possible threat of the caldera residing under Yellowstone national park.

Discussion Questions:

  • Given the information you have about the likelihood of an eruption, do you think resources should be spent trying to release pressure from the caldera? (Consider, this could potentially trigger an eruption)
      • Can you imagine any possible environmental benefits from a Yellowstone eruption?
    • Are there ways in which we can mitigate the possible effects of such  a daunting disaster?
Additional Research:
Full vid from class: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Vn6kxfD3Ek&feature=related


    Monday, January 16, 2012

    Ellie Saake -- January 12 2012

    title: The Effects of Nuclear Weapons

    purpose: The purpose of my presentation was to educate my peers on the detrimental repercussions of using nuclear weapons and of nuclear war. My presentation was also meant to encourage my peers to think critically about what to do with nuclear weapon technology, whether it should be stopped, and how that could ever happen. By showing the environmental and health effects of nuclear weapons, I hope that my presentation was able provide some justification for why  WMD's receive so much media attention.

    discussion questions:
    1) What do you think of the United State's decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagaski?
    2) Should all countries get rid of nuclear weapons? How?
    3) Should the spread of nuclear technology be stopped? How?

    follow up research:
    - Nuclear Threat Initiative: http://www.nti.org/
    - "The Ticking Clock of Iran's Nuclear Threat:" http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-57359410/the-ticking-clock-of-irans-nuclear-threat/
    - An overdramatic, mildly humorous "Nuclear War Simulation:" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6p11DedOmig
    - Nuclear Weapons: Who Has What at a Glance: http://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Nuclearweaponswhohaswhat

    picture:
    Nagasaki before and after the atomic bomb.




















    links to resources: 
    sites:

    Monday, December 5, 2011

    Ellie Saake -- December 1 2011:


    • Title: Food Security & Climate Change
    • Purpose: The purpose of my presentation was to educate my peers on a different, but equally important, aspect of the effects of climate change on our world's ability to feed itself. Though the greater solution to this issue is indeed in making our planet greener, I thought that focusing on this specific aspect of climate change helps to show how a hotter climate has the capability to affect the normalcy of so many different things humans depend on.
    • Discussion Questions:
      1. Which “solution” to food insecurity do you agree with most?
      2. Do you think “neocolonialism” is a realistic outcome of nations 
        competing for food security?
      3. Do you think that we will ever have a world where almost 
        everyone is food secure? Why or why not?
    • Follow-Up Research:
    • Picture: This graph is created by a firm called maplecroft and it evaluate food security on 12 criteria. Some of these include: the nutritional and health status of populations, cereal production and imports, GDP, natural disasters, conflict and the effectiveness of government. Red countries are most food insecure, followed by orange, yellow and then green. There is not enough information to make conclusions about grey colored countries.
            

    Zach - The California Delta

    1) Name and Date: Zach Zeff, 12/01/2011

    2) Title of presentation and purpose:

    • Title: The California Delta
    • Purpose: Educate the class on the delta and a recent development that they can participate in.  A development that would affect all people in california.
    Discussion questions prepared for the class to consider:
    • What do you think? Should the tunnels be built? Why?
    • What would happen to the delta if too much water was used?
    • How would this impact us? The bay?
    Follow up research to add to the discussion:
    • Getting involved by visiting www.bdcpweb.com, Bay Delta Conservation Plan Website. 
    • Currently, the legal battle between water contractors and representatives of california ongoing.  Just talk as of now.
    Picture:
    http://www.usbr.gov/mp/BayDeltaOffice/images/delta_map.jpg

    Links to all resources: (Content, Video, Images)
    • Content:

    http://www.water.ca.gov/swp/delta.cfm
    http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-10-31/news/30344434_1_water-suppliers-delta-accord-bay-delta

    • Video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j04_HEnt2uU

    • Images:

    http://www.usbr.gov/mp/BayDeltaOffice/images/delta_map.jpg
    http://www.water.ca.gov/suisun/photos/images/SMHMrelease.jpg
    http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2009/06/01/delta_smelt_in_hand2_usfws_peter_johnsen_2008_1_1_1.jpg
    http://www.cldadmin.co.uk/get_involved.gif
    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/06/03/nyregion/lens-533.jpg
    http://www.stainlesswaterbottles.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/plastic_water_bottles.gif


    PowerPoint:





    Sunday, December 4, 2011

    Claire Schurz, 11/15,

    Title: 7 Billion and Counting
    Purpose: To examine the effects of the growing population on our world's water supply, specifically the Tibetan Plateau
    Discussion Questions:
    How does overpopulation ad the water crisis relate to Tragedy of the Commons?
    Is it hopeless? Should population control intervene?
    What can change? How can we learn to live with less?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOLf2RbxmzE&feature=relmfu

    No! It is not hopeless.  Change can come in one of two ways.  Either there will be a disaster (war, poverty, hunger, disease, etc.) that will decimate the population OR we can learn to live with less.  Population control does not need to intervene we just need to learn to live with less.  From a water lens, this can be done by eating less meat.  As seen in the video above, livestock requires tons of water from the time it is born to the time it arrives on your dinner plate.  I'm not asking that everyone becomes vegetarians but the whole American idea that dinner must consist of beef cannot sustain us any longer.  We must adapt! Also, we can take shorter showers, turn the sink off when we are not using it,  drink tea vs coffee, etc.  There are also fundamental changes we can make in our irrigation systems to make sure that not one drop of water is being wasted.  Planning irrigation can help tremendously with this.  Just imagine how much water we can save if everyone thought more consciously about how much they were using and how to cut down on it.

    Picture: major rivers flowing from Tibetan Plateau
    http://delhigreens.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/tibetan-plateau-and-its-signifiance-to-India.jpg

    Sources:
    http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/2008/world/china-tibet-and-the-strategic-power-of-water/
    http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2010/04/tibetan-plateau/larmer-text

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011

    Dubai: What is going on there?

    Lena Kristy
    Presented 11/09/11
    Purpose: To educate the class about Dubai as a classic example of the Tragedy of the Commons and to question the city's right to not only use up all of its resources, but our's as well.
    Questions:
    How do you think Dubai's rapid industrialization effects global climate change?
    How will Dubai's natural habitat be harmed?
    What would be the best energy source for an extremely energy indulgent and demanding place like Dubai?
    Research:

    Picture: 

    Links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tPHR5LLvpx4

    http://www.google.com/imgres?q=the+world+dubai&um=1&hl=en&safe=active&client=safari&sa=N&rls=en&biw=1080&bih=576&tbm=isch&tbnid=Jf9ON-6W8Tp1ZM:&imgrefurl=http://dubai-architecture.info/DUB-GAL1.htm&docid=-KWbhCu3rFrlzM&imgurl=http://dubai-architecture.info/TheWorldDubai-custom%253Bsize_796,485.jpg&w=795&h=485&ei=gv_CTrGIO8_ZiQLC8-SDDA&zoom=1&iact=rc&dur=421&sig=107075273281164029834&page=1&tbnh=96&tbnw=157&start=0&ndsp=16&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0&tx=95&ty=33